Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. If English is not your first language and you’ve engaged a professional to polish up the writing, state this. Submission Process Editorial decision-making: Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations. If so, share it with your fellow researchers.
After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where. We agree with you that the paper is much better this way. You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. Why don’t we give you complete access! Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript. Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other:
Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. Submission Process Editorial decision-making: Goldman An experienced journal editor who feels strongly about issues like peer review and is proactive in discussing these issues with authors and others interested in publication.
I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. Still, from this batch of reviewers, C was clearly ersubmission most hostile, and we request that you not ask him or her to review this revision. We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is.
It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Researchthe journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it’s finally accepted. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited.
Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish-American War from a high school literary magazine. A remark cove “We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments resubbmission may have” is a better way to wind up your letter.
After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and resumbission. If not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency. As you formulate these responses, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter. One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer B.
One click sign-in with your social accounts. First, if the decision letter doesn’t spell this out, find out if revisions in your submission should be highlighted and, if so, whether change-tracking, yellow highlighting or colored text letteer preferred.
A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have resubmiwsion corrected” suffices. We even changed the goddamn running head!
This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The journal submission stage can be challenging. It’s not necessary to respond individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper.
Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations. This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive. Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read.
Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Getting your work published in a peer-reviewed journal almost always involves revising your manuscript at least once.
Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions – Academia Obscura
If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your scholarly insights. Apr 14, Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. Assuming you accept manusscript paper, we would also like to add a footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables.
Why don’t we give you complete access! Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: You can learn more about writing a cover letter and handling peer review comments resubmussion these posts: Thus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by 5 pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface.
You ought to be in a cage. If English is not your first language and you’ve engaged a professional to polish up the writing, state this.