Thus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by 5 pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface. A journal’s editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices. You’re looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes. Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive.
Submission Process Editorial decision-making: If so, share it with your fellow researchers. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript. As you formulate these responses, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them. You ought to be in a cage.
Submission Process Dos and don’ts for a great cover letter Read. One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer B. Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read.
Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: Getting your work published in a peer-reviewed journal almost always involves revising your manuscript at least once.
We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. We have again rewritten the entire manuscript from start to finish. Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has improved and benefited.
After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where.
Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions – Academia Obscura
First, if the decision letter doesn’t spell this out, find out if revisions in your submission should be highlighted and, if so, whether change-tracking, yellow highlighting or colored text is preferred. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if kanuscript chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. As you formulate these resumbission, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter. Still, from this batch of reviewers, C was clearly the most hostile, and we request that you not ask him or her to review this revision.
After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise leyter tyrannical power over helpless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches.
A remark like “We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have” is a better way to wind up your letter. For example, if as review C suggested several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that.
It’s not necessary to respond individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them.
Thus, you suggested that we shorten the manuscript by 5 pages, and we were able to accomplish this very effectively by altering the margins and printing the paper in a different font with a smaller typeface.
You’re looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. Goldman An experienced journal editor who feels strongly about issues like peer review and is proactive in discussing these issues with authors and others interested in publication.
You can learn more about writing a cover letter and handling peer review comments in these posts: This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive.
Sign up via email. We even changed the goddamn running head! Baumeister Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers. You ought to be in a cage.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Submission Process Editorial decision-making: If you have elected not to change the manuscript in response to a particular criticism or suggestion from the reviewers, explain why.
Leyter copy each of the reviewers’ comments into your response letter.